Points of View is our blog dedicated to exploring the critical corporate communications issues of the day through insights and videos of Fortune 500 business and communications execs, industry insiders and our team.
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Socially Engaged Enterprises Deliver Exceptional Value Beyond the Transaction
- Another Impact of Digital: More Centralization
- What’s Ahead in the New Year: The Expectation of Engagement
- Get Beyond Tasks At Hand When Making Your Next Hire
- Check the Attitude at the Door: The Responsibility of BU Comms Pros
- Part 3: Engagement Breaks Silos
- The Role of “Corporate” in a Comms Organization
- Part 2: The Seven Drivers of Integration are a Little Eclectic
- Part 1: Integration Matters
- The New CEO and the Power of Symbolism
Video Posts
- The Weekly Pulse: 3/2/11
- PulsePoint Group Corporate Communication Index Series Part 7: Deeper Focus
- The Weekly Pulse: 2/23/11
- PulsePoint Group Corporate Communication Index Series Part 6: Change
- The Weekly Pulse: 1/26/11
- PulsePoint Group Corporate Communication Index Series Part 5: Managing Talent
- The Weekly Pulse: 1/19/11
- PulsePoint Group Corporate Communication Index Series Part 4: Governance
- PulsePoint Group Corporate Communication Index Series Part 3: Deeper Role
- The Digital Story of the Nativity
Tags
- Social Media
- Commentary
- video
- Leadership
- Reputation
- Tips
- Organizational Design
- Internal Communcations
- Trendspotting
- Crisis & Issues Management
- PR Education
- Talent
- 2010 Index
- Engaged Enterprise
- Professional Development
- Crowdsourcing
- Productivity
- PRWeek
- Compensation
- In the News
- Statistics
- Add new tag
- mobile
- The Weekly Pulse
- Innovation
- Collaboration
- Strategy
- media
- Media Relations
- Page Society
- SXSW '11
- Organization Design
- Resource Allocation
- CEO Counsel
- Influence
- Branding
- Financial Crisis
- Feedback
- Online Communities
- Guidelines & Regulations
- Digital Media
- Trust
- SEO
- Implementation
- Marketing
- Integration
- Managing Agencies
- Activism
- Agency Consolidation
- Ethics
- Grassroots
- FedEx
- Advertising
- Mission
- Apps
- Mashable
- CES
- 2011 Trends
- Foursquare
- Communication
- Search
- Content Creation
- Location
- Listening Center
- Arthur W. Page Society
- Influencer relations
- Communications
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008

When Collaboration Stifles Innovation
Jeff Hunt
June 10th, 2011
“A camel is a horse designed by a committee,” so the saying goes.
And while we’ve all suffered through too many committee meetings, we know that most of the time, collaboration is a good thing, producing a better product and speedier results.
But not always. Sometimes, a corporate culture that values collaboration can, overtime, evolve into a cumbersome, process-bound monster that devours innovation and crushes entrepreneurial spirit.
Are you confident that you know whether your organization is producing camels or horses?
Right now, it’s especially important that you do. Social media, advanced video conference technology and other online tools are taking the culture of collaboration - which took root in the 1980s as American companies emulated Japan’s “quality circles” - to a whole new level. On top of that, at a time of economic uncertainly, many middle managers in large organizations are especially insecure about their jobs, and may be inserting themselves unnecessarily into projects in ways that don’t add value, slow them down, and prevent the company from acting rapidly even when it is essential.
How can you tell whether your organization has a little too much togetherness?
• Take a look at the output of your creative efforts. Are you producing horses or camels? If what comes out of projects consistently looks different from what you expected, it’s a red flag.
• Do documents that should flow instead read like they were written in multiple styles by lots of different people? It’s probably because they were. Every document needs an editor, but not every document needs 10 reviewers. “Track changes” makes meddling too easy, and you may need to tell people to resist the temptation.
• Are you experiencing mission creep? Do projects lose their focus and broaden their scope over time? Involving too many people with too many different agendas may be a reason.
• Take a look at lengthy distribution lists for your emails, conference calls, and meetings. Do you really need all those people to be involved? Will each add net value?
• Are you dissatisfied with the flow of new ideas or with the amount of initiative you see among your people? If so, consider whether they have just become discouraged by the bureaucracy that smothers their initiative. Ask the most creative people in the company what they think about this.
Camels have their place. But most businesses today need to produce thoroughbreds to stay competitive. Make sure yours is one of them.
Tags: Collaboration, Commentary, Organizational Design, Productivity