In counseling a new CEO recently on the importance of the First 100 days, we encountered a familiar challenge.
The CEO’s organization, while successful, needs change. Old attitudes and outmoded ways of doing things have become encrusted, and the first hundred days represent a unique opportunity to break those molds at a time when change is almost universally expected and the organization is likely to be most receptive to it.
At the same time, skeptics within the organization are likely to doubt the new CEO’s fidelity to the organization’s core principles. They will almost certainly (though incorrectly) view the change as undermining those principles – and, though they surely won’t admit it, threatening to themselves and to their careers. These skeptics are especially likely to be clustered in a part of the organization most closely associated with carrying out the organization’s mission, and physically separated from the corporate headquarters.
This isn’t unusual. Consider, for example, the skepticism with which journalists at the Wall Street Journal greeted Rupert Murdoch’s takeover, or the people at IBM first reacted to the first CEO to come from outside the company. And, to be fair, the skepticism isn’t always unjustified.
In situations like this, one of the most powerful tools in the new CEO’s arsenal is symbolism. All CEO’s have a mandate for change – some more than others, to be sure, but studies show significant change, especially in strategy and in the leadership team is almost universally expected.
But some change is especially symbolic, and either by design or by accident will send a powerful and lasting message. It’s vitally important that the new CEO seize opportunities to send these symbolic messages, and avoid sending the wrong ones inadvertently. And don’t confuse “symbolic” with “superficial.” It is the substance of these key actions that makes them symbolic.















Weekly Pulse: 3/14/11
PulsePoint Group
March 14th, 2011
A recap of last week’s POV posts:
3/11: SXSW: Back to the Future of Digital: It’s that time of year again when our “live music capital of the world” (Austin, TX) decides to multitask and become the temporary epicenter of all things film, music and digital. Being based downtown, we welcome the SXSW visitors to our neighborhood and can’t wait to get out and mingle with some of the best, brightest and most innovative companies in the industry.
3/8: What it’s Like on the Other Side of the Search: I spent many years on the agency side – at Burson-Marsteller, Ketchum, and GCI Group – pitching business and always wondering what it would be like on the other side of the table. Now I know. My firm doesn’t do a lot of agency search for our clients, but occasionally we’re asked to help out. Coincidentally, we’ve been involved in a few situations just since the beginning of the year. The process is enlightening. Here are some lessons learned that agencies would be well advised to consider.
3/7: Where Strategy and Implementation Meet: Achieving Buy-In: Time Inc. CEO Jack Griffin was recently ousted after less than six months on the job. An agent of change within the organization, his approach to overhauling the ailing media organization clearly didn’t mesh with what his organization was ready for. Griffin’s demise reminds me of the stellar job Louis Gerstner did when faced with a struggling IBM in the early 1990’s. One of the greatest examples of a change agent succeeding, Gerstner was responsible for changing the entire direction of an organization that until he took over was looking to break up its business into smaller units and dissolve others. Today, IBM is a singular technology services powerhouse thanks to Gerstner’s strategic vision and ability to guide the company through a massive change in culture.
Tags: Commentary, Implementation, Leadership, Organizational Design, Social Media, Strategy
No Comments »