Posts Tagged ‘ Commentary ’

Point of View Logo

Points of View is our blog dedicated to exploring the critical corporate communications issues of the day through insights and videos of Fortune 500 business and communications execs, industry insiders and our team.

Michael Gale

Part 2: The Seven Drivers of Integration are a Little Eclectic


August 12th, 2011

The integration philosophy is born from seven concurrent trends (for more on this, stay tuned), but the challenge is that each “one” tends to function in its own differing ways. In effect, true integration often stalls very quickly because we look for limited bridges between one or two areas in our organization, versus looking for customer-led moments where we can test, prove and broadcast the value of integration across a much wider gamut.

puzzle

Seven drivers of integration:

1. Wastage: Marketing is increasingly under pressure to show ROI. Integration portrays much less of a “waste-oriented mantra” than channel-only or share of voice (driven by awareness activities).

2. C-suite lexographic shift: Increasingly c-suites talk about customer journeys and pathways. These views need a more customer-based lens. Integration offers a logical step towards achieving this by talking about combining elements through the journey.

3. Online makes it much easier to track and act faster: Social and digital allow you to track activities in near real-time. This means it is a touch easier to monitor, or at least correlate with simple regressions. For example, what happens when activity A and activity B happen together or in sequence? It is about measurable baby steps to some (apologies for misquoting Bill Murray in the film What About Bob).

4. Budget shortsightedness: SOX forces a lot of late-in-the-quarter investment models and it rarely gives marketers time to roll out large, complex programs. Integration offers a simple process that feels closed-looped enough to quickly justify a change in short-term available funds by the next quarterly scramble. It feels a little like trench warfare (a few inches at a time), but it is the reality of where we are, especially in U.S.-led organizations.

(more…)

Michael Gale

Part 1: Integration Matters


August 10th, 2011

Why one + one is not proper integrated sales and marketing

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

“Integration” is a hot term driven by a combination of seven environmental factors. I contend that “integration” means creating a consistent experience across the customer’s interaction with the brand. The challenge is that it is often siloed into one-on-one situations that aren’t tracked. For example, a customer service agent on the phone might not know that a customer has tried to return an item to the store three times.

The true catalyst of integration evolves around understanding and embracing the value of a customer’s engagement. Experience and evidence shows us that the fully engaged digital and social B2B and B2C brands are the only ones that can fully deliver the promise of integration. Without embracing this philosophy, organizations appear somewhat doomed to poke around the promise of integration.

Digital and social brands that embrace integration reap far more benefits from customer journey-based integration because they get the double-edged opportunity to react faster to market changes, and gain insights ahead of the competition. This is based on managing the customer’s journey and leveraging social and digital as the engagement mechanism.

A Set of POVs to Drive Your Future

In a series of points of views over the next few months we are going to walk through what it takes to be truly integrated, and not just with one or two functions, but across a wide range. We have seen evidence in best practices that the pressure to do social and digital “right” is even greater than before. A limited perspective (one + one) will miss the wider and more effective opportunity.

One + One is Not Really Integration

Integrated online and offline, integrated online and social, integrated sales and channel, integrated media and marketing, integrated communications and brand: These are the marketing (and sometimes sales-based) marriages, especially inside B2B, we increasingly hear about. We call this integration, the integration of one + one. One function plus another bonding together at some point in the customer’s journey. This is a start, but it really is an old world way of thinking and taking advantage of integration.

(more…)

Bob Feldman

Three Ways to Speed Your Company’s Embrace of Social Media


July 6th, 2011

Originally Published PR Week, June 30, 2011 (subscription access only)

I’ve noticed that many companies that instinctively know they should be active in social media are moving forward tentatively and would like to move faster.

These organizations have grasped the importance of social media to their communications strategy. But whether it’s because they’re nervous about diving into the online conversation, or caught up in internal bickering over who “owns” it, or lack confidence in their strategy, their tentative pace is denying them the benefits of a more robust online engagement. They know they should be moving faster, but they’re not sure how to do it.

Last week, while I was participating in an excellent Arthur W. Page Society “Future Leaders Experience,” the group addressed this problem. Three success factors for accelerating successful online engagement emerged from the discussion:

1. Pique their competitive nature with a “best practices” assessment

Companies are often risk averse and don’t like to be too far out front in using new technologies. Reviews of “best practices” often provide a level of comfort that comes from knowing what their peers are doing, learning from the mistakes of others, and benchmarking their own progress against leaders both outside and from within their own industries.

But “best practices” reviews have another motivating effect: they fire up people’s competitive instincts. Nothing concentrates management’s attention so much, or motivates them to action, as learning that a competitor is stealing the lead on them, and the race to benefit from engagement in social media is no exception.

2. Identify the key digital influencers in your space, and the hidden successes in your company

Sometimes, organizations don’t move forward because they don’t know where to start. In social media, management may be aware of platforms like Twitter and Facebook as factors in their personal lives, yet have no idea how those two platforms – and the much larger online ecosystem – influences their customers, employees and other stakeholders. Without knowing where to target their attention or their resources, they end up doing nothing.

They may also be relatively unaware of the small, experimental efforts already underway within their organization.

The fix? Do a thorough audit of the “digital ecosystem” in which your company operates, together with a careful look inside the company to see where social media activity already is (or isn’t) underway. Find opportunities to create small success stories, and make the people who have achieved them champions (and trainers) who can help bring other, less adventurous, units up to speed.

Don’t be surprised if some of your best success stories come from tired, mainstay brands that are willing to take some risks to rejuvenate their image. Think about how P&G stalwart “Old Spice” shook up its category with the “I’m on a horse” video that went viral.

(more…)

Jeff Hunt

When Collaboration Stifles Innovation


June 10th, 2011

“A camel is a horse designed by a committee,” so the saying goes.

And while we’ve all suffered through too many committee meetings, we know that most of the time, collaboration is a good thing, producing a better product and speedier results.

But not always. Sometimes, a corporate culture that values collaboration can, overtime, evolve into a cumbersome, process-bound monster that devours innovation and crushes entrepreneurial spirit.

Are you confident that you know whether your organization is producing camels or horses?

horses

Right now, it’s especially important that you do. Social media, advanced video conference technology and other online tools are taking the culture of collaboration – which took root in the 1980s as American companies emulated Japan’s “quality circles” – to a whole new level. On top of that, at a time of economic uncertainly, many middle managers in large organizations are especially insecure about their jobs, and may be inserting themselves unnecessarily into projects in ways that don’t add value, slow them down, and prevent the company from acting rapidly even when it is essential.

How can you tell whether your organization has a little too much togetherness?

• Take a look at the output of your creative efforts. Are you producing horses or camels? If what comes out of projects consistently looks different from what you expected, it’s a red flag.

• Do documents that should flow instead read like they were written in multiple styles by lots of different people? It’s probably because they were. Every document needs an editor, but not every document needs 10 reviewers. “Track changes” makes meddling too easy, and you may need to tell people to resist the temptation.

• Are you experiencing mission creep? Do projects lose their focus and broaden their scope over time? Involving too many people with too many different agendas may be a reason.

• Take a look at lengthy distribution lists for your emails, conference calls, and meetings. Do you really need all those people to be involved? Will each add net value?

• Are you dissatisfied with the flow of new ideas or with the amount of initiative you see among your people? If so, consider whether they have just become discouraged by the bureaucracy that smothers their initiative. Ask the most creative people in the company what they think about this.

Camels have their place. But most businesses today need to produce thoroughbreds to stay competitive. Make sure yours is one of them.

Paul Walker

“Listening” Is An Area Ripe For Innovation


May 31st, 2011

We recently took on a unique assignment: 24/7, global monitoring and reporting for 10 days around a mega announcement in the mobile industry.

We had developed the social media game plan for the announcement, and the CEO and our client believed effective listening was critical to success. Of course, they were right. Since the assignment was coming from the corner office, we didn’t hesitate to say “yes.”

We set up a Listening Command Center in Austin for the global announcement to deliver two reports daily and alerts, as appropriate. We submitted our first report to the CEO and his team and the response was immediate and positive and contained a new request: “We need this every three hours for the next ten days.” After our team leader picked herself off the floor, we reorganized ourselves and delivered a flash report every three hours. The CEO used our insights masterfully, adapting his messages and presentations in near real-time based on the hot topics, questions and sentiment of the online conversation.

Computer class

The project gave us a good taste of the future: 24/7, real-time listening to inform dynamic strategies. A few leading companies like Dell and Pepsi set-up command centers to manage listening for customer service and early warning on emerging online issues, but few companies are using real-time insights to rapidly adjust marketing and communications strategies.

Our process was solid. We had four top-notch analysts working around the clock – so our people were solid. Our technology? Not so much. Radian 6 worked well. We had to complement the tool with Google Reader to get the job done. The project proved once again to us that today effective listening is about having the right people and process in place. Current monitoring tools are secondary and often have to be second-guessed or double-checked for accuracy.

In the next 12 months technology is positioned to do more of the heavy lifting. There are some products in academic labs and start-ups utilizing approaches like Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), an advanced form of statistical language modeling, to data mine large amounts of data for “diamonds.” Future tools also will be intelligent and learn about the problems they are being used to solve.

In short, we want to push a button and have technology tell us in near real-time and more accurately what people are talking about online surrounding an announcement or new product or disease or issue. We want a clearer indication of what’s new or different about the conversation.

Then smart analysts can spend their time drilling down on new insights that might make a difference to marketing, communications, product development and other areas of enterprise.

PulsePoint Group

Weekly Pulse: 4/8/11


April 8th, 2011

A recap of last week’s POV posts:

4/6: Google Launches +1 as Part of Social Push: Last week Google launched a new social feature called +1. For searchers with a Google account, they will have the option of clicking the “+1″ button, which is similar to the Facebook “like.” Then, other searchers who are signed into Google will see “+1″ feedback from their connections.

3/24: SXSWi Wrap Up: SXSW is over … and I’m not going to lie, I’m enjoying the decrease in downtown traffic and increase in cell signal. Overall though, I had a blast at SXSWi and was impressed with this year’s line up.

3/16: Web Now Second Only to TV as News Source: For media relations and communications professionals, understanding where target audiences go for news is critical. A new report from the Pew Research Center reveals that for the first time, the web has passed newspapers as the second most popular source of news. It’s second only to television.

Brittany Aguilar

Google Launches +1 as Part of Social Push


April 6th, 2011

Last week Google launched a new social feature called +1. For searchers with a Google account, they will have the option of clicking the “+1″ button, which is similar to the Facebook “like.” Then, other searchers who are signed into Google will see “+1″ feedback from their connections.

ReadWriteWeb explains Google’s reasoning for the new feature,

“But in the long run, Google says +1 will help users find relevant content, and that’s good news if, indeed, your site delivers. Google also says that ‘as with any new ranking signal, we’ll be starting carefully and learning how those signals affect search quality.’”

+1 Means More Personalization

Google has been working on breaking into the social space in a big way, but I’m not sure this is it. While social media has proven that people value the references and input of their real-life friends, that may not be true when a user is looking for a specific type of content rather than just browsing. Especially, when your friends might not have experience in the category you are searching for.

Ray Grieselhuber of GinzaMetrics says that search results will keep moving toward increased personalization.

“Despite its growing presence in our daily lives, one of the least talked-about, most important trends in online marketing and media today is the expansion of personalization. Within just a few years, internet users are going to expect highly personalized experiences with their brands, videos, games, websites, shopping, and yes, searches.”

Personalization will certainly mean more relevant search results and more relevant marketing strategies overall, but the user-experience of rating search results might be difficult. By the time you realize that a site is helpful for you, you’ve probably already left the search results.

(more…)

Renée Francese

SXSWi Wrap Up


March 24th, 2011

sxsw-interactive-recap1

SXSW is over … and I’m not going to lie, I’m enjoying the decrease in downtown traffic and increase in cell signal. Overall though, I had a blast at SXSWi and was impressed with this year’s line up.

The five days of Interactive were packed with wall-to-wall sessions and inspiring keynotes. The stand out keynote for me was Felicia Day, the creator and star of The Guild. I learned she is a fellow U.T. alum, math major and class valedictorian! Felicia talked about how she harnesses the power of social media to build her show and how others can do the same. She had a quirky way of getting her points across. I think a crowd favorite was  “your campaign should not be a booty call; it’s a long term relationship.” I believe her point here is that you should be engaging fans on an ongoing basis, and not just when you need their money or support.

My favorite session I attended was, “The Future of Storytelling: DEXTER Fans Play Killer.” The panel was made up of the Dexter ARG “alternate reality game,” team. Howard Goldkrand, director of Innovations Modernista!, really honed in on transmedia storytelling, stating “… if done right, creates a sense of community and personal experience.” He also urged the audience to think about content in context. Of course having die-hard fans (literally) didn’t hurt the success of their campaign either!

As my colleague Austin predicted, location-based services was a major topic. I especially enjoyed Foursquare’s Kick Off party at Moltov and all the free swag. A location-based app that generated some buzz was SCVNGR. The app is a real world location-gaming service, which is part game, part new business model for daily deals. The company is hoping to compete with Groupon and Living Social.

Cloud computing was another popular topic, with speakers from VMWare, Salesforce.com and Google all making appearances at sessions. The overall message was that the cloud is an ever-evolving technology, which enables companies in the corporate or start-up phase to gain virtual computing access on the cheap.

(more…)

PulsePoint Group

Weekly Pulse: 3/14/11


March 14th, 2011

A recap of last week’s POV posts:

3/11: SXSW: Back to the Future of Digital: It’s that time of year again when our “live music capital of the world” (Austin, TX) decides to multitask and become the temporary epicenter of all things film, music and digital. Being based downtown, we welcome the SXSW visitors to our neighborhood and can’t wait to get out and mingle with some of the best, brightest and most innovative companies in the industry.

3/8: What it’s Like on the Other Side of the Search: I spent many years on the agency side – at Burson-Marsteller, Ketchum, and GCI Group – pitching business and always wondering what it would be like on the other side of the table. Now I know. My firm doesn’t do a lot of agency search for our clients, but occasionally we’re asked to help out. Coincidentally, we’ve been involved in a few situations just since the beginning of the year. The process is enlightening. Here are some lessons learned that agencies would be well advised to consider.

3/7: Where Strategy and Implementation Meet: Achieving Buy-In: Time Inc. CEO Jack Griffin was recently ousted after less than six months on the job. An agent of change within the organization, his approach to overhauling the ailing media organization clearly didn’t mesh with what his organization was ready for. Griffin’s demise reminds me of the stellar job Louis Gerstner did when faced with a struggling IBM in the early 1990’s. One of the greatest examples of a change agent succeeding, Gerstner was responsible for changing the entire direction of an organization that until he took over was looking to break up its business into smaller units and dissolve others. Today, IBM is a singular technology services powerhouse thanks to Gerstner’s strategic vision and ability to guide the company through a massive change in culture.

Bob Feldman

What it’s Like on the Other Side of the Search


March 8th, 2011

Originally Published PR Week, March 4, 2011 (subscription access only)

I spent many years on the agency side – at Burson-Marsteller, Ketchum, and GCI Group – pitching business and always wondering what it would be like on the other side of the table.

Now I know.

My firm doesn’t do a lot of agency search for our clients, but occasionally we’re asked to help out. Coincidentally, we’ve been involved in a few situations just since the beginning of the year.

The process is enlightening. Here are some lessons learned that agencies would be well advised to consider.

Stand for something. During an RFI stage, particularly if the agency’s information is being communicated only in writing, be sure you write your information in a concise, crisp manner – and absolutely be sure your firm stands for something. Have a point of view on measurement; articulate a client service model or an approach to audience insights that you believe works exceptionally well for your firm and for your clients.

Pure capabilities are only a starting point; why would having good capabilities mean you should win? Don’t you think the client is only talking to firms with the requisite capabilities? And sell yourselves, don’t sell against others. Selling against others is usually off-the-mark and is almost always unappealing.

Read the rules. When clients are considering a range of agencies, they’re looking for reasons to either include or exclude firms from the next round. Don’t give them easy reasons to exclude you. Sounds ridiculous, but in just a few situations, I’ve already seen firms respond to a request for two or three paragraphs on a subject with eight or nine paragraphs; with a request to provide a three-to-five page narrative on a client situation with a 19-page PowerPoint deck; with a request for certain insights into international market credentials with a link to the company’s website. Don’t make it so easy to cut your firm.

(more…)

Recent Posts

Video Posts

Tags

Archives

Subscribe to RSS

addtomyyahoo4
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to My AOL
Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to netvibes
Add to Google

original feed View Feed XML
— or —

Subscribe by Email