Why one + one is not proper integrated sales and marketing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
“Integration” is a hot term driven by a combination of seven environmental factors. I contend that “integration” means creating a consistent experience across the customer’s interaction with the brand. The challenge is that it is often siloed into one-on-one situations that aren’t tracked. For example, a customer service agent on the phone might not know that a customer has tried to return an item to the store three times.
The true catalyst of integration evolves around understanding and embracing the value of a customer’s engagement. Experience and evidence shows us that the fully engaged digital and social B2B and B2C brands are the only ones that can fully deliver the promise of integration. Without embracing this philosophy, organizations appear somewhat doomed to poke around the promise of integration.
Digital and social brands that embrace integration reap far more benefits from customer journey-based integration because they get the double-edged opportunity to react faster to market changes, and gain insights ahead of the competition. This is based on managing the customer’s journey and leveraging social and digital as the engagement mechanism.
A Set of POVs to Drive Your Future
In a series of points of views over the next few months we are going to walk through what it takes to be truly integrated, and not just with one or two functions, but across a wide range. We have seen evidence in best practices that the pressure to do social and digital “right” is even greater than before. A limited perspective (one + one) will miss the wider and more effective opportunity.
One + One is Not Really Integration
Integrated online and offline, integrated online and social, integrated sales and channel, integrated media and marketing, integrated communications and brand: These are the marketing (and sometimes sales-based) marriages, especially inside B2B, we increasingly hear about. We call this integration, the integration of one + one. One function plus another bonding together at some point in the customer’s journey. This is a start, but it really is an old world way of thinking and taking advantage of integration.
















Part 2: The Seven Drivers of Integration are a Little Eclectic
Michael Gale
August 12th, 2011
The integration philosophy is born from seven concurrent trends (for more on this, stay tuned), but the challenge is that each “one” tends to function in its own differing ways. In effect, true integration often stalls very quickly because we look for limited bridges between one or two areas in our organization, versus looking for customer-led moments where we can test, prove and broadcast the value of integration across a much wider gamut.
Seven drivers of integration:
1. Wastage: Marketing is increasingly under pressure to show ROI. Integration portrays much less of a “waste-oriented mantra” than channel-only or share of voice (driven by awareness activities).
2. C-suite lexographic shift: Increasingly c-suites talk about customer journeys and pathways. These views need a more customer-based lens. Integration offers a logical step towards achieving this by talking about combining elements through the journey.
3. Online makes it much easier to track and act faster: Social and digital allow you to track activities in near real-time. This means it is a touch easier to monitor, or at least correlate with simple regressions. For example, what happens when activity A and activity B happen together or in sequence? It is about measurable baby steps to some (apologies for misquoting Bill Murray in the film What About Bob).
4. Budget shortsightedness: SOX forces a lot of late-in-the-quarter investment models and it rarely gives marketers time to roll out large, complex programs. Integration offers a simple process that feels closed-looped enough to quickly justify a change in short-term available funds by the next quarterly scramble. It feels a little like trench warfare (a few inches at a time), but it is the reality of where we are, especially in U.S.-led organizations.
(more…)
Tags: Commentary, Integration, Organizational Design, PR Education
No Comments »